There Is A Field

"A militant kind of aggressive religiosity, sometimes called fundamentalism, has grown up in every single one of the major world traditions as a rebellion against this imbalanced world, a rebellion against humiliation, powerlessness and there is a sense of rage expressed in religious terms.

~Karen Armstrong

Twisted and focused by men insane with hatred and fear, this kind of fundamentalism was used against us ten years ago.  There is no excuse or redemption for what they did... at least not in this life... but we must still look objectively at how we fell victim to these predators of spirit.  And victims we are... the perpetrators, their supporters, those who perished, those who lost loved ones, those who stood in horrified witness... all of us

We must, as a people and as a species, move beyond the small and petty definitions of perceived right and wrong and embrace the beauty of difference God has blessed us with.  This is my day's tribute:

"Out beyond ideas of wrongdoing and rightdoing,

there is a field. I will meet you there.

When the soul lies down in that grass,

the world is too full to talk about

language, ideas, even the phrase each other

doesn't make any sense."

Jalāl ad-Dīn Muḥammad Rūmī

13th-century Persian, Muslim poet, jurist, theologian, and Sufi mystic.

Halfway to Nicaea

Mosaic: Church of the Loaves and Fishes, Tabgha (Heptapegon) Israel

Photo by hoyasmeg

The Truth of Immutability

"The belief that Christ was married has never been official church doctrine. It is neither sanctioned nor taught by the church. While it is true that a few church leaders in the mid-1800s expressed their opinions on the matter, it was not then, and is not now, church doctrine."

Official Statement

Tuesday, May 16, 2006

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

Dr. Robert L. Millett is the Richard L. Evans Professor of Religious Understanding at Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah.  He is also a professor of ancient scripture and emeritus Dean of Religious Education.  For the past 30 years, inter-faith dialog has been a focus for Dr. Millett.  He takes a rather pragmatic view of LDS doctrine.  Back in January of 2008, I had the opportunity to hear him speak.

Dr. Millett was the invited guest on the Peabody Award winning national public radio program Speaking of Faith.  The 2008 presidential debates had fallen into a sort of dogmatic quagmire as largely misunderstood and misrepresented concerns of Mormon culture and belief dominated the political discussion.  Dr. Millett was called on to help frame that discussion by sharing some of his thoughts on Mormonism.  During the course of the conversation one rather unassuming question led to a startling and even evocative response:

"I wonder, you know, is revelation still happening and are there teachings that stop making sense at times or are there new ideas that arise?"

Dr. Millett framed his answer in a then recent controversy surrounding author Dan Brown's The Da Vinci Code.   He paraphrased the official church response to the debate regarding the san greal (holy grail) or the mythical cup used to capture some of the blood spilled at Jesus' crucifixion and the sang real (royal blood) or the inference that Jesus married, had children, and established a holy or royal line of progeny.

"The scriptures are silent as to whether Jesus was married.  It is true that early church leaders may have offered their opinion on this matter, but those opinions did not then, nor do they now, constitute the doctrine of the church."

So far nothing too extraordinary but how Dr. Millett interpreted its significance really was.  He declared this statement establishes the idea that while Mormons revere, honor, respect, and uphold their church leaders, they do not believe in a form of prophetic infallibility.  He went on to acknowledge the church continues to formulate its truths.  Sometimes it even revises and expands on core doctrines and understandings.

"And so we — as we, as we move into the 21st century now, and as we begin having a greater focus upon Christ and Christianity and Christian principles, I think there is a tendency to look back and say, 'All right, what are the central saving doctrines? And what are some other things we, A, don't know much about, B, just don't seem to be in harmony with what, with what — and where we are now?' And I think that's taking place more and more."

Mormonism is extraordinarily young in terms of religions.  It was less that 200 years ago that Joseph Smith triumphantly proclaimed that sacred Christian scripture was no longer closed and began presenting his revelations and additional texts.

"Compared to the Christian church, which has been at this for a couple of millennia, we're about halfway to Nicaea. And so... cut us a little slack, will you? Give us a little time. We're in the religion-making business, and this takes time. It takes centuries. And trying to explain the faith and articulate the faith, that doesn't come over night.  We've really only been about that for 20 or 30 years."

Now I realize Dr. Millett tailored his presentation to non-Mormons.  He used language unfamiliar to most anyone who's sat through Mormon services.  But Dr. Millett represents a growing trend within Mormon intellectual circles to tone down religious rhetoric and to finally speak more pragmatically about the evident changes in LDS culture and theology.  He is still one of the church's foremost experts on the gospel and is tremendously influential in preparing the next generation of LDS theologic thinkers.

The Information Age has had an extraordinary effect on not just Mormonism but religion in general.  Information and resources that were once difficult to access are now just a few key strokes away.  Research that was once obscure now only requires a simple internet search engine to discover.  The free flow of information requires a new approach to theological conversation.  A new tone of inclusion and respect of difference is required to reach a more informed populace.

In a way, Dr. Millett has summed up my personal journey... looking back and identifying central doctrines I find helpful and moving on from those ideas that are not in harmony with what and where I am today.  Traditional Mormon doctrine has tried to present itself as static and immutable.  Dr. Millett has given us a rare glimpse into the mechanisms for refining understanding if not out right change evident within the faith.  For this I am grateful and, in some small measure, feel more connected to the tradition of my forefathers.